One option which appeared in late April 2020 was Oak National Academy.
This was a set of resources, including video lessons and supporting materials, which were produced by a team of teachers who were supported to create and share materials which could be used remotely. They were supported by the DfE and received a great deal of funding.
Resources were produced for a range of subjects including geography.
I took a look when the first few lessons launched, as did others, and they were problematic in their language and emphases. I blogged about them at the time.
They improved as time went on, and found a use not just during the lockdowns, but also when teachers returned to schools, or found themselves with hybrid learning for a while, with a stop-start school year, and pupils who were shielding or cautious of returning to in-person school settings.
There was also some criticism that they were deskilling teachers.
As a parent, I would also have been concerned if my children's teachers were relying on them too much for work, or homeworks. As the pandemic eased, some schools and teachers continued to use the resources, or direct certain people to them: home schoolers etc.
".@MccreaEmma, @OakNational's head of curriculum, points out that their lessons are designed to be flexible rather than being used as a full curriculum that is 'prescribed across all schools'. 'While there are lesson resources that teachers can use as a supportive..." 1/2
— Dr Jill Berry (@jillberry102) July 2, 2022
Having got used to using the resources, some teachers were disappointed when they were removed from the platform.
United Learning produced the Geography materials and disagreed with the decision to remove them.
Oak was a charitable collaboration between a group of schools and trusts to support teachers and children through an emergency. The video lessons and support materials were seen to be useful by many and generated a lot of goodwill.
— Jon Coles (@JonColes01) September 2, 2022
Government is now using the Oak goodwill and materials to set up a govt body with the same name to produce resources to promote its own preferred curriculum model. It is wrong for them to do this and wrong for government to develop a preferred lesson-by-lesson curriculum at all.
— Jon Coles (@JonColes01) September 2, 2022
On their website, they said at the time:
United Learning was pleased to be one of a group of partner organisations which came together to provide lessons for students and curriculum support for teachers through the pandemic. We believe that the trusts and schools which created Oak and provided the lessons performed a valuable national service at a time of crisis.This was an independent, charitable activity led by schools and trusts in the national interest and supported by philanthropic funding. The partners were grateful for some government financial support, which accelerated production of video lessons. It was never a government project.
However, we think it is wrong for government to take over the Oak resources and do not support the creation of an NDPB to do so. There should not be a ‘government approved’ curriculum, nor any suggestion of one – whether presented as ‘optional’ or not.
As we do not think government should be getting involved in provision of lesson-by-lesson curriculum resources, we have declined the government’s offer of money to hand our resources to the new NDPB.
However, we are conscious that our resources – representing over 1,500 video lessons with associated curriculum plans and resources – are a core and popular part of the original Oak offer for teachers. We will thus continue to share these materials, free of charge, with any teachers or schools that wish to access them via a new site www.ContinuityOak.org.uk. This platform will be active as of 1 September and will be further developed as we receive feedback on the user experience.
Continuity Oak Geography Lessons
Since then, things have changed substantially within this area.Ofsted should evaluate Oak National Academy’s lessons, syllabus and resources to make sure they are up to scratch when it becomes an arms-length curriculum body, a think tank saidhttps://t.co/Z8r3IbdhuO
— Education Media Centre (@EMCUK) August 23, 2022
More herehttps://t.co/wJOURDb025
GA Chief Executive Alan Kinder said at the time:
“The GA is looking forward to working as one of Oak National Academy’s new curriculum partners. This partnership will enable us to further support a large number of teachers of primary geography throughout the country, through the provision of high-quality lesson materials and curriculum plans written by expert teachers from the GA’s subject community. This collaboration will therefore complement the professional services the GA already provides to its members in primary schools nationally.”
A sample Primary unit is now up and available:๐ @OakNational’s new curricula and first teaching resources are live. So is the first phase of an entirely new product.
— Matt Hood (@matthewhood) October 12, 2023
๐ง๐ซ It's all designed around supporting in-class teaching.
๐ค But, what’s actually in it? Buckle up... ๐งต๐https://t.co/nqSiilLSjJ
Comments