I'm starting to explore a few AI related avenues for a project I'm going to be involved in for the next few months.
I'm interested in the ethics of using AI when teaching geographical topics, and the implications for students' understanding of the world if they are exposed to images, text and other information which have been AI generated.
So far, we have had the launch of several large language models (LLMs) such as Chat GPT and a number of image models such as Dall-E and Midjourney. The map below was actually generated by Adobe Creative Cloud / Firefly for Education, which I have access to via school.
The prompt was: "A map of Europe, with the letters A and I hovering over it in gold with rainbow edges".
Quite a few people have shared how they use prompts to elicit certain outcomes from LLMs in a geography context. But should we be using it in our teaching and if so, what disclaimers should we display when we have used it?
One ethical issue for me that should be considered is that of plagiarism, and the use of authors' works to 'train' the models without their permission. Using AI isn't developing students' geographical knowledge or imagination.
There are also issues with image generation. Models can't handle the fine detail of letters and other graphical content, or the fine details such as how many fingers on a person is too many.
There are some early map creators that have been developed and made free of charge. One is called PROXI, but doesn't seem to do a great deal that a simple tool like ArcGIS Online could do with a few clicks anyway.
Here's an output: a map of second hand book shops in Iceland - I made a map of Iceland to test it out.
She wrote this piece for the Guardian on the growing environmental costs of AI due to the energy needs of data centres.
I also downloaded a keynote presentation from the recent EuroGeo Conference which was given by Nico van der Weghe from Gent University. It includes some useful ideas.
Comments