As you'd imagine, we are preparing to submit evidence and support the consultation for the new curriculum review to discuss what we hope to see in a future curriculum with respect to the geography entitlement and the nature of what is studied. This will involve us discussing and consulting with the many stakeholders the RGS has.
A review of the 11-16 Curriculum and Assessment, chaired by former Education Secretary Charles Clarke.
Report is here. (PDF download)
Written by Paul Steer, Head of Policy at OCR.
I've been fortunate to work on a few things linked with OCR's work over the years, and serve on their Consultative Forums for both Geography and Natural History.
This is one of several documents currently being explored as part of the work we are doing at the RGS on the Education Committee. It was produced after extensive involvement of stakeholders and 2000 young people.
Main findings (from OCR website):
The report’s recommendations include calls to:- Reduce the number of assessments used at GCSE, spread them out across the two years of key stage 4, and review the appropriate use of non-exam assessments
- Reduce the content of the GCSE curriculum, allowing more time for the study of broader skills and competences
- Introduce a benchmarking qualification, taken on screen, in maths and English to highlight gaps in students’ knowledge and provide structure to Key Stage 3
- Redesign the English Language GCSE as a matter of urgency, and include a broader definition of English skills including media and spoken language
The report has generated a great deal of positive reaction. Geoff Barton, Chair of the Independent Commission of Oracy in England, said: “This report provides an important, evidence-based agenda for the new government’s curriculum and assessment review, and provides a welcome opportunity to keep what’s good in our education system but improve what’s not good enough.”
Comments